The 2025 NBA playoffs have delivered the most exciting first round in recent memory, and leave it to the West — which has brought high drama all season — to bring it home with two Game 7s this weekend.
Nuggets vs. Clippers. Rockets vs. Warriors. Who will advance? Our NBA writers make their picks, plus look ahead to the East's semifinal matchups.
Nuggets-Clippers, Game 7: Who wins?
Ben Rohrbach: Nuggets. The Clippers are deeper, but depth is not as important in a Game 7, when rest is not an option. What matters is who can be their best, and our money should be on Nikola Jokić. The Clips are defending him with Ivica Zubac, an All-Defense candidate, and still Jokić is averaging a 25-12-11 on 51/45/70 shooting splits. I think he can be even better, so I am picking the Nugs.
Advertisement
Dan Devine: Nuggets. I went with Nuggets in seven before the series, and I am not a coward, so I’m sticking with it. One more monster Jokić-and-Murray game, with home-court advantage, to close it out.
Morten Stig Jensen: Nuggets, but I don't feel great about it. Game 7s are such a crap shoot. Emotions are high, guys are nervous, and the pressure of the atmosphere, I can only imagine, is absolutely nuts. As such, I have to be overly simplistic and go with Denver because it has the best player in the sport.
Rockets-Warriors, Game 7: Who wins?
Devine: Warriors. Maybe I’m a sucker, but I’m sticking with Golden State. I’ve been incredibly impressed with how the Rockets have played throughout this series … but I can’t shake the feeling that Stephen Curry’s got one more dagger to plunge into Houstonians’ hearts before he’s all said and done.
Advertisement
Jensen: Warriors. Again, Game 7s are nuts. So there are a lot of elements to consider. I'm hanging my hat on Golden State's experience, but like with Denver, I don't feel great about it. Houston's defense is legit, and it's putting Stephen Curry through it every time he has to initiate simple actions. This will be a nail-biter.
Rohrbach: Warriors. I cannot envision a scenario in which Stephen Curry, Jimmy Butler and Draymond Green lose three elimination games in a row to a team that does not have a closer. The Warriors are far more experienced, and that matters in a Game 7. Does it scare me that the momentum seems to have swung in Houston’s direction? Sure. But give me the Warriors by a whisker.
Cavaliers-Pacers, Round 2: Who wins?
Jensen: Cavs in 5. Perhaps six. Cleveland is the better team, and that's with all due respect to Indiana, a team that functions as a well-oiled machine in its own right. But the talent level in Cleveland, and the offensive heights it can reach, I believe, is too much to overcome for the Pacers.
Advertisement
Devine: Cavs in 6. The uncertainty around Darius Garland’s toe injury gives me some pause, especially as a Known Pacers Respecter who was trying to tell y’all that Indiana was the goods all the way back in January. But I’ve also been trying to tell y’all that Cleveland is historically excellent for at least that long.
Indiana’s going to stress out Cleveland’s coverages and game plans to a much, much greater degree than Miami was able to in Round 1. But I think the collective shooting, playmaking, versatility and high-end talent that this iteration of the Cavs brings to bear is just a cut above; I think Tyrese Haliburton’s going to get hunted mercilessly; and I think Cleveland’s moving on to the Eastern Conference finals for the first time since 2018.
Rohrbach: Cavaliers in 6. The Pacers are better than people think. They are certainly better than I thought, as I picked the Bucks against them in seven games. It took them only five games to prove themselves as the deeper, more talented team. That is not the case against the Cavs, who are even deeper and even more talented. They can do anything the Pacers can but better.
Celtics-Knicks, Round 2: Who wins?
Rohrbach: Celtics in six. It makes me nervous that consensus considers this an easy series for the Celtics. Jalen Brunson is incredible, and New York’s Villanova boys never quit. Boston is banged up, too. But I just cannot imagine a scenario in which the defensive combination of Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns does not get pick-and-rolled to death. This is what the Celtics have done to them in the past, and it has yielded 130.2 points per 100 possessions this season.
Advertisement
Jensen: Celtics in 5. Tom Thibodeau is going to lose the math battle, and New York's lack of depth is going to make the Knicks tired, which isn't exactly an asset when their opponent can run and gun all day long.
Devine: Celtics in 5. This is the nightmare matchup for these Knicks — the bar they saw set last season and that they were very clearly attempting to reach with their offseason moves, but that they have proven all season long to remain incapable of reaching. (For the millionth time: New York went 0-10 against the Celtics, Cavs and Thunder during the regular season, and 51-21 against everybody else.) Respect for Jalen Brunson’s record of stellar postseason performances requires me to project one out-of-body-experience type of win. Beyond that, though? I expect the C’s to be gentlemen about moving on to yet another Eastern Conference finals.
Comments