New York|Court Overturns Trump’s Half-Billion-Dollar Judgment, but Upholds Fraud Case
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/21/nyregion/trump-fraud-james.html
The ruling handed the president a financial victory, and some legal validation, as New York appeals judges agreed that the fine in his civil fraud case was excessive.

Aug. 21, 2025, 11:19 a.m. ET
A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out a half-billion dollar judgment against President Trump, eliminating the enormous financial penalty while declining to overturn the fraud case against him.
“While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award to the state,” wrote Peter Moulton, one of the appeals judges whose lengthy and convoluted ruling reflected significant disagreement among the five-judge panel.
The president’s appeal will now most likely move to New York’s highest court, providing him another opportunity to challenge the finding that he was a fraudster.
Thursday’s ruling handed Mr. Trump a financial victory and represents a major setback for the New York attorney general, Letitia James, who is one of the president’s foremost adversaries. The case had been a career-defining victory after she campaigned for the attorney general’s office promising to bring Mr. Trump to justice.
However, the decision fell short of the legal vindication the president had been seeking in his fight against Ms. James. In denying Mr. Trump’s bid to throw out the case, the court kept in place the ruling that he had committed fraud, an ignominious distinction for a sitting American president.
Ms. James filed the case against Mr. Trump and his family real estate business in 2022, accusing them of inflating his net worth to obtain favorable loan terms. After a monthslong trial, the judge overseeing the case ruled last year that Mr. Trump was liable for fraud, denting the real estate mogul image that underpinned his political rise.
Thursday’s ruling came almost a year after judges heard oral arguments on the appeals case, an unusual delay that reflected the legal and political complexities of a case against a sitting president. The case infuriated Mr. Trump, who has sought revenge against Ms. James. His Justice Department has opened multiple cases into her and her office.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Ben Protess is an investigative reporter at The Times, covering President Trump.
Jonah E. Bromwich covers criminal justice in the New York region for The Times. He is focused on political influence and its effect on the rule of law in the area's federal and state courts.
Comments